The birth of Jesus is famous for having taken place in a stable, as per the story of the Nativity. However, not all of the famous elements of the Nativity actually come from the Bible. What about the place of Jesus’ birth? Was he born in a barn, or a cave as some people think? Or instead, could he have been born in an actual house?
The traditional place where Jesus was born
According to the traditional Nativity story, Mary and Joseph placed their newborn baby Jesus in a manger. This was a feeding trough for farm animals. What is the reason for this unusual setting for Jesus’ birth?
The reason is that Joseph and Mary had travelled to Bethlehem to be registered for a Roman census. However, when they arrived in Bethlehem, there was no room in the place in which they had intended to stay.
For this reason, they had no other choice but to find shelter in a stable, or barn. There, after giving birth, Mary and Joseph placed him in one of the mangers which was being used to feed the animals.
Alternative opinions
Although the traditional viewpoint is that Joseph and Mary took shelter in a stable, this is not the only opinion. The Bible’s account of the birth of Jesus is actually not very specific. All it says regarding this point is the following:
“And she gave birth to her son, the firstborn, and she wrapped him in strips of cloth and laid him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the lodging place.” – Luke 2:7
According to this, Jesus was laid in a manger because there was no room in the lodging place for Joseph and Mary. However, this does not necessarily mean that they went to a stable. The reason for saying this is that mangers, or feeding troughs, are not only found in stables.
Was Jesus born in a cave?
One alternative possibility is that Jesus was born in a cave. Why do some people think this? The basic reason is that it was a custom in those times to keep animals in caves. Of course, proper stables did exist. However, sheltering animals in caves was also common. In fact, it still takes place even today.
In a cave, the owner could carve mangers, or feeding troughs, directly into the rock. According to some researchers, the manger of the Nativity story could have been this type of manger.
This would mean that Jesus was not born in a stable or any other proper manmade structure. Rather, he was born in a cave. However, this is not the only alternative.
Was Jesus born in a house?
Another suggestion that has become popular in recent years is the idea that Jesus was actually born in a house. This idea comes from the suggestion that it was a common practice in first-century Judea for families to bring animals into the lowest room of their house during the night.
As such, the house itself would have a manger for feeding the animals. Hence, this interpretation argues that Joseph and Mary did in fact find shelter in a proper house. The reason that Jesus was placed in a manger was therefore not because they were in a stable, but simply because the house itself had a manger in it.
While this might sound reasonable, does it really hold up to scrutiny? And what about the idea that Jesus was born in a cave?
What does the evidence really show?
The first thing to note is the fact that the account in the Book of Luke very directly states that the reason that Jesus was laid in a manger is because of the fact that there was no room for them in ‘the lodging place.’
In those days, it was a common practice for towns to provide a common room for travelers to stay in. The fact that the text says ‘the lodging place’, using the Greek definite article, suggests that the text is indeed referring to this specific common room where visitors would be expected to stay.
Therefore, the fact that Luke specifically says that there was no room for them there, and that this is why Jesus was place in a manger, strongly suggests that they did not stay in a house of any sort. It would hardly have been necessary to place the baby in a manger if they were already inside a house – surely there would have been more appropriate options!
Furthermore, while caves were used for sheltering animals, an actual stable seems more likely. One reason is that Joseph and Mary evidently did not travel far from their intended lodging place before the actual birth took place. Otherwise, they would likely have been able to find shelter with hospitable guests elsewhere.
This suggests that the manger was in a location that was just next to the lodging place. Hence, an actual stable, either next to or possibly attached to the main building, makes more sense.
See all the latest news from Greece and the world at Greekreporter.com. Contact our newsroom to report an update or send your story, photos and videos. Follow GR on Google News and subscribe here to our daily email!
