When Was Rome Really Founded?

Depiction of Romulus and Remus at the Cathedral of Maria Saal in Rome.
Depiction of Romulus and Remus at the Cathedral of Maria Saal in Rome. Credit: Wikimedia Commons, CC-BY-SA 4.0

The 21st of April is the traditional anniversary of the founding of the ancient city of Rome. According to legend, Rome was founded when Romulus and Remus started building a city on the Palatine Hill after being abandoned as infants and raised by a wolf. The traditional date for when Romulus founded Rome is April 21, 753 BCE. This would make Rome 2776 years old today. But is this really when Rome was founded?

The archaeology of the city of Rome

In reality, the archaeology of the city of Rome shows that it existed long before this, at least in some sense. There is definite evidence of a settlement there dating back to the ninth century BCE. For example, archaeologists have found remains of a stone wall along with pottery dating to that era.

In fact, there is even some evidence that the Palatine Hill was the site of a human settlement as early as the tenth century BCE.

Therefore, the evidence is clear that Rome existed in some form or another since long before the date of its official founding. What does this mean for the legends? Does this mean that the archaeology contradicts them and proves that they are just fiction? This is what some researchers claim, but the reality is more complicated than that.

What Greek mythology really says about the founding of Rome

Rather than suggesting that Romulus was the first person to ever build a settlement on the Palatine Hill, a variety of ancient Greek and Roman records make it clear that there was a previous settlement there.

For instance, Virgil’s Aeneid describes how a Greek king named Evander had founded a city in that same location, which he called Pallantium. Evander was an older contemporary of Aeneas, a prince of Troy during the Trojan War.

This was not an invention of Virgil, as some people erroneously believe. This same tradition is supported by Dionysius of Halicarnassus, a Greek historian of the first century BCE. It is also supported by Ateius Philologus, a Roman historian of that same era.

In fact, Ateius even tells us that Evander’s settlement was not the earliest either. According to this Roman historian, the original settlement on the Palatine Hill was named Valentia, and then in the time of Evander it had its name changed to ‘Rome’.

The much earlier historian named Antiochus of Syracuse, of the fifth century BCE, supports this inasmuch as he claimed that there had been a Rome that existed before the Trojan War.

Archaeology and legend on the earliest Rome

With these facts in mind, what can we say about the possible correspondence between the legends and the archaeological evidence?

Firstly, we should note that there is evidence that the ancient Greeks were mistaken in their calculations of the date of the Trojan War. Greek scholar Nikos Kokkinos is one of the modern historians who has demonstrated this. His research and that of others places the Trojan War centuries more recently.

Herodotus, for example, places the Trojan War just two generations before the Spartans colonized Santorini. The archaeological evidence for Spartan presence on Santorini starts in the seventh century BCE and no earlier. Likewise, King Midas of Greek legend was a contemporary of that war and definitely lived in the late eighth century BCE.

This means that Aeneas would have lived centuries more recently as well. Based on this fact, what can we conclude about the very earliest settlement uncovered by archaeology at Rome? These remains are likely traces of the Valentia that Ateius Philology mentioned. At some point, it became the city of Evander. When did that happen?

When Evander founded Rome

The settlement that Evander supposedly founded is particularly interesting. He was a Greek king, and yet the Greeks did not start settling Italy until the eighth century BCE. This supports the aforementioned conclusion that the Trojan War occurred centuries more recently than its traditional date.

Archaeology has revealed some significant evidence in this regard. Although the evidence is limited, some scholars have argued that there may have been a Greek colony at the Palatine Hill in the eighth century BCE.

In all probability, Evander’s legendary Greek city almost certainly has its origin in this apparent Greek colony. It dates to some time after the very earliest settlement at Rome. This is exactly like how Evander’s Greek city allegedly came sometime after the founding of Valentia according to Ateius Philologus.

Thus, from one perspective, Evander was the one who founded Rome. He apparently did this in the mid-eighth century BCE. Perhaps by coincidence, this corresponds to the traditional date of the founding of Rome, 753 BCE.

When Rome was founded by Romulus

Now we come to the most significant of Rome’s foundings. According to the earliest records, Romulus was the direct son of Aeneas. This would place him a few generations after Evander. This is very interesting because it suggests that Romulus actually lived in the seventh century rather than the eighth century BCE.

The archaeological evidence for seventh-century Rome supports this conclusion. For instance, the Roman Forum was one of the foundation cornerstones of the city. Archaeology shows that the Forum first appeared in the seventh century BCE.

Furthermore, Romulus allegedly constructed a temple to Jupiter. According to archaeology, the first temple remains in Rome date to the seventh century BCE. This, again, supports the conclusion that Romulus actually lived in that century, about 100 years after his traditional dates.

Additional support for this comes from the fact that an important building called the Regia first appeared in c. 625 BCE. Roman legend credits the Regia to Numa Pompilius, the king who came just after Romulus.

When was Rome really founded?

In summary, what can we say about the true date of the founding of Rome? Well, the archaeology indicates that the most famous founding, which was the one by Romulus, actually occurred in the mid-seventh century BCE, about 100 years after the traditional date.

However, it appears that there was a founding of Rome near 753 BCE, although not connected to Romulus. In reality, the archaeology suggests that this was when the Greeks founded a colony at the future site of Rome. This would therefore be a match for Evander’s city. Yet not even this was the earliest founding of Rome. Before then, a settlement already existed at the Palatine Hill, likely the origin of the legendary Valentia recorded by Atieus Philologus.

Dune’s House of Atreides is Named in Honor of an Ancient Greek King

Dave Bautista in Dune
Greek-Filipino actor Dave Bautista in Dune (2021). Credit: Warner Brothers

Dune: Part Two, like the first installment is making a big impact in the world of cinema. According to figures released this month, the sci-fi epic is nearing $700 million at the worldwide box office. The movie is an adaptation of the 1965 science fiction novel, also titled “Dune,” by Frank Herbert.

The sci-fi thriller tells the story of a group of families that fight for control of a powerful resource known as “spice” on the planet Arrakis.

Directed by Denis Villeneuve, who also previously directed the science fiction remake “Blade Runner 2049”, the film was met with acclaim by critics and fans.

The protagonist of Dune, Paul Atreides, the son of Duke Leto of House Atriedes, joins his family to take over Arrakis, the planet recently awarded to them by the ruler of the Universe.

Paul and his noble family are descendants of Atreus, specifically Agamemnon — Atreus’ most notable son— and thus are known as Atreides, an ancient Greek name for those who come from Atreus’ direct line.

This reference grounds the story of one of ancient Greece’s most famous rulers — Agamemnon — and his legacy in mythology and the epic poetry of Homer.

Agamemnon infamously offended Chryses, the priest of Apollo, and Apollo spread pestilence among the king’s people.

The story of Agamemnon, the root of Dune’s Atreides family

At the beginning of the first book of the Iliad of Homer, Agamemnon insulted Apollo’s priest by refusing to give back his daughter, whom he had captured in a raid.

The priest knelt in front of Agamemnon and begged him to release his daughter.

But Agamemnon told the priest to get out of his sight as quickly as he could, lest he lost his patience.

The frightened priest runs away from the Greek camp. When he was at a safe distance, he immediately prayed to Apollo to punish the Greeks.

He reminded the god he had built a temple to honor and worship him, offering him rich sacrifices. “Make the Greeks pay for my tears,” he appealed to Apollo.

Chryses called Apollo “Sminthian,” the god of plague. The name Sminthos came from a town in Troas near which the Greeks had possibly pitched their camp.

Apollo listened to Chryses, becoming very angry with the insolence of Agamemnon.

He rushed “like night” out of Mt. Olympos in Thessaly and landed in the Greek camp near Troy.

He started shooting his invisible plague arrows at mules and dogs and then soldiers.

Homer says the dead fell to the ground for nine days, and fires everywhere burned their bodies.

This plague came to an end only by appeasing Apollo.

Achilles, “of the swift feet,” the greatest hero of the Trojan War, asked Kalchas, the “blameless” seer accompanying the troops, to reveal the reason why Apollo was spreading plague among the Greeks.

Achilles assured Kalchas he could count on him for his protection, so he urged him to tell the truth.

Kalchas said Apollo was furious because of the way Agamemnon had treated his priest, Chryses.

The Greeks, Kalchas said, should return “the glancing-eyed” daughter of the priest, Chryseis, to him and sacrifice 100 cattle in honor to Apollo, who would then cease his biological warfare against them.

Despite the threats of Agamemnon, Achilles and Kalchas prevailed. The Greeks returned Chryseis to her father, and Apollo stopped shooting them with his arrows of disease.

The Siwa Oracle Alexander the Great Visited in Egypt

Alexander the Great before the Oracle at Siwa
Alexander the Great before the Oracle at Siwa. Engraving by Francesco Salviati (Italy, Florence, 1510-1563) (crop). Public Domain

After Alexander the Great added Egypt to his conquests, he went on a long, perilous journey to meet the ancient Siwa Oracle where he received a mysterious message.

By 332 BC when the young king had already conquered vast swathes of the Persian empire in Anatolia, Syria, and the Levant, he proceeded south, taking over Palestine, Phoenicia, and Egypt, expanding his empire.

Alexander was a restless spirit and frequently pondered philosophical questions. He also faced several practical challenges, such as the assassination of his father, the dangers posed to a ruler, the purpose of his conquests, and how he would legitimize his rule as a Pharaoh. After all, his teacher was the great philosopher Aristotle who embedded some of his wisdom in his pupil.

When in Egypt, the king heard about the famous Oracle at Siwa, the most respected in the Eastern Mediterranean. He decided to make the journey to seek the oracle that would answer the questions that were torturing him.

The journey to faraway Siwa, deep in the desert bordering with Libya, is shrouded in mystery. Upon his return, Alexander had changed.

The Conquest of Egypt

The conquest of Egypt was crucial for Alexander the Great in order to secure his lines of communication. The Persian navy was still strong, maintaining bases in Egypt that were posing a threat to Greece. Persia still possessed a powerful navy that could threaten Greece and Macedonia, so Alexander needed to destroy all its bases. Furthermore, he wanted to secure Egypt from enemies who could attack his empire. He was also eyeing Egypt’s wealth.

At the same time, the Egyptians resented the Persian rule, so they greeted Alexander as a liberator and did not resist his army. During his time in Egypt, the young king made reforms such as organizing the military forces, introducing the Greek tax system, restoring temples of the Egyptian gods, offering traditional pharaonic sacrifices, and building the city of Alexandria to glorify his name.

Alexander the Great sought to govern Egypt in a manner that would earn him the Egyptians’ respect, portraying himself not as a tyrant, but as a benevolent ruler who would uphold their dignity and freedom. He showed respect for their civilization, their deities, and their way of life. And as the rulers of the past, he decided to visit the Oracle at Siwa.

Journey to the Oracle at Siwa

The Oracle at Siwa was located in a deep depression known as the Siwa Oasis, located in an isolated part of the desert towards the northwestern border with Libya. During the 26th Dynasty, the Pharaoh Amasis (r. 570-526 BC) built a shrine to Amun at the oasis to assert Egyptian control and win the favor of the Libyan tribes. The Egyptians worshipped Amun as the king of the gods, the equivalent of Zeus in Ancient Greece.

In February of 331 BC, Alexander the Great and his army entourage embarked from the city of Memphis with enough supplies to survive the Western Desert. It was a journey under scorching heat, full of hardships and disorienting mirages, but none of that would diminish Alexander’s determination, as the ancient sources say.

During the long journey, the Greeks ran out of water, but a hard rain helped quench their thirst and refill their water containers. Once they lost their way due to a sandstorm, but they were shown a path by two ravens or two snakes that guided them. This divine intervention proved to Alexander that he had the assistance of the gods, that his journey was truly purposeful, and that he would arrive safely at Siwa.

The Oracle at Siwa

It is not known how long the journey to Siwa was. But once the Greeks arrived, Alexander was mesmerized by the lush palm groves and cool, clear springs surrounding the ancient stone temples of Amun. The Oracle of Amun at Siwa was a deeply revered site. Just like the Oracle of Delphi in Greece, it was famous for its cryptic prophecies.

As instructed, he approached the oracle with the necessary reverence and asked to hear the divine message from the priests of Amun. There are three historians who wrote about the meeting of Alexander with the oracle, Arrian, Plutarch, and Quintus Curtius Rufus. Of the three, Arrian is considered the most reliable because he drew directly from Alexander’s generals. According to him, Alexander received a satisfactory reply by the Oracle at Siwa, but he did not write anything about Alexander’s questions and the answers he received.

Plutarch wrote that the priest greeted Alexander as the son of Zeus-Amun and informed him that the empire of the world had been reserved for him and that all of Philip of Macedon’s murders had been punished. The Roman Quintus Curtius Rufus, who was criticized as not being very reliable, also said that the priest greeted Alexander as the son of Amun. Alexander replied that his human form had made him forgetful of this and inquired about his empire and the fate of his father’s murderers. Quintus Curtius Rufus added that Alexander’s companions asked whether it would be acceptable for them to offer divine honors to Alexander and received an affirmative answer.

Alexander’s Change After Siwa

After visiting the Oracle at Siwa, Alexander had changed. He started presenting himself as a god. Other than advertising himself as a god, it was a political move. As a foreigner, he wanted to legitimize himself in the eyes of the Egyptians, since rulers as gods or with characteristics of gods were common in Egypt and other territories in the Near East.

As Alexander the Great’s conquests expanded his empire further and further, his Companions noted a shift in behavior. He became more unpredictable and despotic. He exhibited signs of megalomania and paranoia, demanding that members of the Court would kneel before hime. For the Greeks, such an act was reserved for the gods and that strained the relationship between him and his Companions.

While this behavior might have been a result of the message he received at the Oracle at Siwa, is not certain. After all, his behavior was changing gradually as his conquests were multiplying. The consultation of the Oracle at Siwa is still an event shrouded in mystery, because whatever the message he received was, Alexander continued his victorious campaign as before, albeit more confident and fearless.

The visit to the Oracle at Siwa further contributed to the mythologization of Alexander’s persona, both during his lifetime and in World history.

World’s First ‘Miss AI’ Beauty Pageant Offers $20k Prize for Top AI Models

0
AI-generated woman
AI-generated models will compete in a new beauty pageant for the title of “Miss AI”. Credit: Torsten Behrens / CC BY 2.0 / Wikimedia Commons

On Sunday, applications opened for the brand-new “Miss AI” competition. What sets this competition apart from other iterations of the popular beauty pageantry format is that the models themselves will not be human.

Instead, Miss AI is a beauty pageant for artificial intelligence (AI) models, who will be judged on their aesthetic qualities and influence on social media.

A ground total of $20,000 in prize money is up for grabs, with the creator behind the winning AI model set to receive $5,000 prize money and $3,000-worth promotional assistance on Fanvue, a subscription-based platform hosting virtual models. Further PR advice and assistance worth $5,000 will also be given to the winner.

A beauty pageant for AI models

According to the official website, the virtual contestants will be assessed in three categories: “beauty”, “tech”, and “social clout”.

“AI creators’ social clout will be assessed based on their engagement numbers with fans, rate of growth of audience, and utilization of other platforms such as Instagram,” commented the World ‍AI Creator Awards (WAICAs), behind the Miss AI pageant and forthcoming competitions.

“We share the vision for the WAICAs to become the Oscars of the AI creator economy,” said Will Monanage, the co-founder of Fanvue.

Of the four judges, two are AI models themselves with large followings on social media platforms like Instagram. The two human judges are Andrew Bloch and Sally Ann-Fawcett. Bloch’s background is in business and technology, whereas Ann-Fawcett is a beauty pageant judge, historian, and former contestant.

AI is being used in new – and arguably, unsettling – ways

Many social media influencers make a living sharing their content online with thousands of followers. Major companies are keen to collaborate with these influencers to advertise their products to a widening audience that increasingly eschews traditional media platforms like radio and television.

Some of the top social media influencers are young women who attract large numbers of followers thanks to their looks. However, with the arrival of AI-generated imagery, an increasing number of virtual models have been gaining similarly large numbers of followers on social media.

Social media is not the only space where AI avatars are making inroads. Some TV channels and news stations are also experimenting with AI-enabled hosts. For example, Channel 1, a Los Angeles-based startup, is experimenting with what they call, “the world’s first AI-powered news network.”

Such uses of AI, especially for public-facing roles like news anchors and presenters, or social media influencers, whose appeal is based on a sense of human intimacy, have their share of proponents and detractors.

Those in favor of the new phenomenon view these new uses for AI as promising innovations, whereas critics tend to perceive them as steps toward a digital dystopia. Time will tell who is right.

How the Ancient Greeks Halted the Expansion Of Persia

Battle of Marathon
The showdown between the ancient Greek city states and the Achaemenid Empire of Persia was one of the pivotal moments of antiquity. Credit: Georges Rochegrosse, / Public domain / Wikimedia Commons

World history could have been very different than what it is today had the ancient Greeks not halted the expansion of Persia through a series of epic battles on land and sea. These took place in the 4th century BC.

Known as the Persian, or Greco-Persian Wars, the conflict between the vast Persian Empire and a coalition of Greek city-states lasted from 499 to 449 BC and ended with the Peace of Callias treaty. This was once all Persian garrisons had been expelled from Greece, nearby European territories, and the land of the Scythians.

Beyond securing European territory, the triumph of the Greek allied forces against Persia is widely considered to have safeguarded values, such as democracy, and the political system of Greek city-states. These were later adopted by the Romans and spread across Europe after the Renaissance and the revolutions of the 18th and 19th centuries.

All the surviving primary sources for the Greco-Persian Wars are ancient Greek, the most important being Historia, written by the fifth-century Greek historian Herodotus. He is known as the “Father of History.”

Despite criticism from later ancient historians as well as contemporary scholars, Herodotus’ account of the events is largely corroborated by archaeological findings.

The reputation of some of the eponymous protagonists of these battles survived to the modern era when they became global symbols of bravery and heroism. Such has also been the case with the heroes of the Trojan War, which took place seven centuries prior to the Greco-Persian Wars.

The Greco-Persian Wars

After Aristagoras, the Greek ruler of Miletus, declared a constitutional government in his city, he went on to expel the occupying Persians from the other city-states in Asia Minor.

Aristagoras then sailed to the Greek mainland and requested help in fending off the inevitable Persian reprisal. The Spartans refused him, but the Athenians promised to send twenty triremes, and the Eretrians promised a further five.

Trireme in the modern day.
Trireme in the modern day. Credit: George E. Koronaios. CC BY 4.0/flickr

The vessels arrived in 498 BC, and the Ionians swiftly attacked and burned the city of Sardis, situated in modern-day Cyprus. This move inspired rebellions in other places with ancient Greeks in the states of Caria, Bosporus, the Hellespont, and Cyprus all rising up against Persia.

However, the Persians did eventually reclaim Cyprus in 496 BC, and Persian army groups then went on to retake control of the Bosporus and the Hellespont. Employing a huge fleet of ships, recruited from Phoenicia, Egypt, and Cyprus, the Persians won a decisive victory at sea and then sequentially took back control over rebellious city-states on the coast. Miletus was captured in 494 BC, and the Ioanian revolt was put to an end in 493 BC.

Once they had put down the Ionian revolt, the Persians made plans to invade the Greek mainland and bring about a calmer state of affairs. However, before Greece could be invaded directly, preparations had to be made in the surrounding areas.

Preparing for the Invasion of Greece

Darius, the Persian ruler, gave his son-in-law Mardonius the responsibility of achieving this task in 492 BC. Despite losing many men to the sea during a violent storm, Mardonius was successful in securing the strategic approaches to Greece.

The Persians’ main expedition took to the waters in 490 BC under the command of Datis and another official called Artaphernes, the former being the son of a powerful Satrap (provincial governor in the ancient Persian Empire). The first target was the island of Rhodes just off the southern coast of Ionia. The Persians did try to besiege the city of Lindos, but they failed.

The island of Naxos in the Cyclades was the first to fall to the Persians, with settlements being burnt and the population either fleeing into the mountains or being taken as slaves.
After this, the Persians targeted the island of Delos, which—after Datis had demonstrated his power—was spared destruction.

The fleet then island-hopped across the Cyclades, taking hostages and soldiers until they reached the city of Karystos in Euboea on the mainland of Greece. The city refused to surrender hostages and was raided until the leaders gave in and submitted to the Persians.

The first major city the Persians reached was Eretria, which they attacked and captured after a week-long siege, enslaving its people.

The Battle of Marathon

The next goal of the Persian forces was to get onto the Greek mainland. They chose the beach at Marathon as their entry point and were met by an army of Greeks, mainly from Athens. A five-day standoff ensued.

Despite outnumbering the ancient Greeks by more than two to one, the forces of Persia chose to put their soldiers back onto their ships and select another place to land. Once the cavalry had been loaded, however, the Greek forces sprung an attack, routing the Persian flanks before declaring a decisive victory and demolishing any hopes the Persians had of continuing the campaign.

Interbellum (490 – 480 BCE)

Following the Persian loss, it was evident that a much larger army was needed to defeat the Greek city-states, particularly if they united. Darius set out on his task to build an enormous army to take on this task.

However Darius died in 486, and his son, Xerxes I, took over his work. By 481 BC, the army building was complete, and Xerxes began the march toward Greece.

The Second Persian Invasion of Greece (480 – 479 BC)

The second Persian invasion of Greece marked the height of the conflict. With an army ten times the size of Darius, Xerxes was confident he could take Greece. The Persian forces crossed the Hellespont on two enormous pontoon bridges. Modern historians suggest the army may have been around 200,000 soldiers strong. Furthermore, it may have been supported by a fleet of between 600 and 1,200 triremes.

A relief depicting Xerxes.
A relief depicting Xerxes. Credit: Sebastià Giralt. CC BY 2.0/flickr

August 480 BCE: The Battle of Thermopylae

The ancient Greeks strategically decided to defend the narrow pass at Thermopylae, positing that the bottleneck would reduce the numerical advantage of Persia. Led by Spartan King Leonidas, several thousand Greek hoplites defended the pass for two days.

When he intuited that the Persians were about to outflank the Greek force, he sent the main Greek force away and stayed behind with 300 Spartan warriors and 700 Thespians to delay the Persian advance. On the third day, the Persians took Thermopylae and killed Leonidas and his soldiers.

While the conflict in Thermopylae was playing out, the Greek fleet of 271 triremes defended the Straits of Artemisium in the Battle of Artemisium. This protected the Greek flank at Thermopylae. Following the defeat at Thermopylae, the badly damaged Greek fleet withdrew.

September 480 BC: Destruction of Athens and the Battle of Salamis

After forcing their entry to nearly all of northern Greece, the Persian army burned Athens. They had hoped they could induce a Greek surrender by destroying the Greek fleet. Under the lead of Themistocles, the Greek fleet retreated to the Isthmus of Salamis directly off the coast to the west of Athens.

Canvas depicting the Battle of Salamis
Canvas depicting the Battle of Salamis Credit: History Maps. CC BY 1.0/flickr

It was there that the Persians suffered under their great numbers. This led to their being unable to maneuver effectively. After obliterating 200 Persian vessels, the Greeks secured a decisive victory.

From the Battles of Plataea and Mycale to the Wars of the Delian League

The Persian forces made an effort to draw the Greeks out into the open, where their larger army could make use of its cavalry. They set up camp north of a small river near the city of Plataea, where the Greek forces, heavily outnumbered, attempted to outmaneuver the Persians but were caught in the open and separated.

Siege of Plataea.
Siege of Plataea. Credit: Elbert Perce. CC BY 4.0/Wikimedia Commons/Elbert Perce

Despite the strategic error, the Greek hoplites were immensely powerful, and the Persian army was defeated at the Battle of Plataea.

Just a few days later, a Greek army at Mycale in Asia Minor won a victory over the Persian forces that were sent to face them. With the help of the Ionian Greeks who rebelled against their Persian commanders, the Greeks captured the Persian camp and burned the remaining Persian ships in another decisive battle.

Following the victories at Plataea and Mycale, the wars between Greece and Persia took a major turn, with the ancient Greeks now leading the offensive. The Athenians attacked and took the city of Sestos in 479 BCE in an effort to deny the Persians access to the Hellespont.

A year later, the Greeks sailed on Byzantium, which they captured after besieging the city. With control of Sestos and Byzantium, Hellespont and Bosporus were more or less denied to the Persian forces. This was an action that brought the second invasion of Greece to a close.

Following Xerxes’ failed attempt to conquer and subdue Greece, the Greeks continued their offensive in the Wars of the Delian League which lasted from 477 to 449 BC.

The Battle of Eurymedon and the Egyptian Revolt

On the southern coast of modern-day Turkey, the Persians had begun to regroup and rebuild their fleet. However, this fleet of around two hundred ships was destroyed by the Greeks in the Battle of Eurymedon sometime around 469 to 466 BC.

In the mid 480’s BC, the Egyptian Satrapy (area of Egypt ruled by a Satrap, a governor of the Persian Empire) rebelled against Persian rule. After roughly two decades, the Athenians chose to intervene on the side of the Egyptians, and the campaign ended in disaster when the Greek forces were besieged and destroyed in the 460s BC during the Egyptian Revolt.

A Peace Treaty Between the Ancient Greeks and Persia?

Historians are still in debate with one another as to whether a peace treaty took place, but the conflict appeared to die down, and actions were taken that suggest that some kind of agreement was reached. Thus, the conflict came to a close. A notable date suggested is 449 BC, when the Greeks exited the island of Cyprus.

The Greco-Persian Wars flared and calmed throughout their duration, and although the open war between the Greeks and the Persians came to an end, it was by no means an end to the struggle between the two powers. This also didn’t mean the end to the effects of conflict on the common people.

Persia participated in other battles, while Greece experienced a deadly war, known as the Peloponnesian War, between Sparta and Athens. It would be another century before Alexander the Great arrived on the scene and put an end to the Achaemenid Empire.

When did Persia become Iran?

Persia was historically the common name for the area of land known as Iran. However, on the Nowruz (holiday marking the Persian New Year) of 1935, then leader of the country, Reza Shah officially asked foreign delegates to use the Persian term Iran, the endonym of the country, in formal correspondence.

Henceforth, the people of Iran were referred to as Iranians rather than Persians.

Reza Shah Pahlavi as Minister of War.
Reza Shah Pahlavi as Minister of War. Credit: آنتوان سویروگوین.CC BY 4.0 Wikimedia Commons آنتوان سویروگوین

How does Iran relate to Greece in the modern day?

Amid the escalating conflict in the Middle East, which was sparked by the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7th last year, Iran, which funds, trains, and provides weapons to Hamas, launched more than 300 drones and missiles against military targets into Israel.

The country did this in response to an alleged Israeli attack on Iran’s consulate in Damascus on April 1st, which killed Iran’s top soldier, Brigadier General Mohammad Reza Zahedi, among other Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commanders.

The government of Greece issued a stern condemnation of Iran’s drone attack on Israel, labeling them as a “significant escalation.” Authorities in Greece are maintaining a state of alert and staying in close contact with Western allies, while Greek missions remain active in the wider region.

Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis expressed his condemnation of Iran’s attack and called for restraint to avoid a wider regional conflict.

“These are extremely unpleasant and very disturbing developments that are sparking a new conflagration in our wider neighborhood and of course in the Middle East,” Mitsotakis said.

“I want to start with the clear and unequivocal condemnation of the Greek Government and me personally against Iran’s attack on Israel,” he added in a message on social media.

Can Fool’s Gold Become the New Gold?

Pyrite, also known as Fool's Gold
Pyrite, also known as Fool’s Gold. Harvard Museum of Natural History. Pyrite. Chicote Grande, Inquisivi, La Paz, Bolivia. Credit: DerHexer Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 4.0

Pyrite, also known as fool’s gold because of its brass-yellow bright metallic luster, could be a potential source of lithium, an essential component in clean energy.

Lithium is the chemical element used in rechargeable batteries for mobile phones, laptops, digital cameras, and electric vehicles. It is also used in non-rechargeable batteries that are used in heart pacemakers, toys, and clocks.

The particular chemical element was discovered from a mineral, while other common alkali metals were discovered from plant material. This is thought to explain the origin of the element’s name; from ‘lithos’, the Greek word for stone.

Lithium is found in rock ores, which are mined and crushed, or in briny water, where it can be extracted using evaporation. Lithium is an essential component of clean energy technologies, from electric vehicles (EVs) to the big batteries used to store electricity at power plants.

Furthermore, it has more sinister applications: Lithium-6, an isotope of the soft metal, is crucial for breeding tritium, which is the hydrogen isotope that lies at the heart of nuclear fusion. Along with the above qualities of lithium, we can understand why the U.S. government calls it a critical mineral.

Another property of lithium is that it is incredibly reactive. Pure lithium violently interacts with seemingly innocuous water, releasing heat and forming highly flammable hydrogen.

Lithium from Fool’s Gold

The high cost of lithium production has pushed scientists to seek less costly ways to obtain this important chemical element.

According to a Phys.org report, a team led by researchers from West Virginia University is exploring whether previous industrial operations could serve as a source of additional lithium without generating waste materials.

Shailee Bhattacharya, a sedimentary geochemist and doctoral student working with Professor Shikha Sharma in the university’s IsoBioGeM Lab, struck fool’s gold when they found traces of the chemical in pyrite.

The study focused on 15 middle-Devonian sedimentary rock samples from the Appalachian basin in the U.S. The team found plenty of lithium in pyrite minerals in shale, a fine-grained, clastic sedimentary rock formed from mud.

Organic-rich shale may show potential for higher lithium recovery as a result of that curious interaction between the precious element and pyrite. However, samples from other geological sites need to be taken in order to find whether the same interaction would occur.

Bhattacharya said that this finding is promising because it hints at the possibility that certain shales could be a source of the element that doesn’t require new mines. This method would also be a very green option, as starting up new lithium mines costs a lot in time, money, and environmental pollution.

April 21, 1967: Military Junta Places Greece in Shackles

Greece junta 1967
The Greek Junta took power in the country on April 21, 1967, leading to seven years of brutal dictatorship. Public Domain

On April 21, 1967, Greece woke up to a military junta taking over power. The colonels at the head of this brutal regime ended up putting the country in shackles for seven years.

For Greeks, it is a date they would like to erase from their history. For the people who were jailed and tortured, it is a date that brings back unpleasant memories and nightmares even half a century later.

This is even more so for families of people whose lives were lost during the Greek junta regime; these are families who can neither forget nor forgive the perpetrators.

For the army colonels who overthrew the government and established a seven-year long dictatorship, April 21, 1967 was the day of the Revolution and the rebirth of the Greek nation.

“The Revolution of April 21st” was the slogan of the Greek junta dictators, using as a symbol the phoenix rising from the flames and a soldier standing before it.

The political turmoil that led to the coup

Many politicians, as well as King Constantine II of Greece, feared that the army would most likely intervene to get the country out of the political turmoil of the mid-1960s.

The political crisis led Prime Minister Georgios Papandreou to resign on July 15, 1965. However, young King Constantine appointed successive prime ministers from Papandreou’s own party, which only led to more unrest.

There were signs that there was upheaval within the army at the time. It was expected that generals would likely intervene to curb the violent demonstrations of that month.

However, it was almost two years later that three lower-ranking officers took everyone by surprise when, in the space of one day, they took over power in Greece.

It was Colonel Georgios Papadopoulos, Brigadier General Stylianos Pattakos, and Colonel Nikolaos Makarezos who ordered the tanks to roll into Athens on that fateful day.

Junta Greece
Georgios Papadopoulos, the leader of the military dictatorship. Pubic Domain

April 21, 1967

On the morning of April 21, 1967, Greeks awoke to a nightmare. The ominous rumble of tanks, occasional rifle shots, and military songs playing on the radio signified one thing: from that point on, life would not be the same.

Then came the sinister announcement on the radio: “The Hellenic Armed Forces [have] undertake[n] the governance of the country.”

Greek soldiers took over the most important strategic areas of Athens and then arrested all key politicians and Lieutenant General Grigorios Spandidakis, the Commander-in-Chief of the Greek Army.

After the politicians and Spandidakis were arrested, many individuals, comprising both prominent figures and ordinary citizens who belonged to Greece’s left wing, were likewise methodically arrested. A list of 10,000 names had previously been compiled by the military.

Those rounded up included prominent personalities, such as composer Mikis Theodorakis and other less well-known artists and academics.

The excuse of “the colonels,” as the junta was described by many, was that Greece was in grave danger of falling into the hands of communists. The black-listed 10,000 individuals were sent to prison or to the Yaros Island concentration camp.

The least fortunate of the political prisoners suffered brutal torturing, leaving them scarred for life.

The Greek junta suspended 11 articles of the Constitution to establish their regime. Freedom of speech ceased to exist, and along came strict censorship rules instituted for radio, newspapers and, later on, television.

At the same time, many Greeks became informants to the police, spying on their neighbors. Anyone could be arrested if police were informed that the “culprit” had spoken harshly of the colonels and the regime.

The Greek junta in power

As a smokescreen to hide all their shameful acts against their own people—what then-U.S. Ambassador Phillips Talbot had called “a rape of democracy”—the dictators started a  campaign to increase their popularity among the population.

A huge amount of public projects were begun, using army troops to build new schools, hospitals, factories, stadiums, and roads. This had the effect of increasing their popularity with some Greeks, but it was not enough to make up for the events throughout the country.

Realizing that they were isolated from the rest of Europe, and condemned by most Greeks—especially those who were in self-imposed exile—the Greek junta made further efforts to be more democratic, humane, and appealing.

They held huge public celebrations on the April 21st anniversary and other national holidays such as March 25th and October 28th. These great commemorations were widely attended by the public, as well as highly publicized.

Resistance in Greece and abroad

The resistance against the colonels inside Greece and abroad continued throughout the seven long years of their rule, however.

Politicians, intellectuals, artists, and academics who lived abroad raised their voices in unison in telling the world about the human rights violations by the colonels and how they were holding Greeks captive, so to speak, through their ruthless regime’s policies.

The left wing and democratic elements of Greek society were naturally opposed to the junta right from the start. Militant groups formed in 1968 both in exile and in Greece to promote democratic rule.

These included the Panhellenic Liberation Movement, Democratic Defense, and the Socialist Democratic Union. The first armed action against the junta was Alexandros Panagoulis’ failed attempt to assassinate Georgios Papadopoulos on August 13, 1968.

The assassination attempt occurred during Papadopoulos’ commute to Athens from his Lagonis summer residence, during which he was escorted by personal security.

Panagoulis set off a bomb at a strategic point on the coastal road at which Papadopoulos’ vehicle would be forced to slow down. However, the bomb failed to injure Papadopoulos.

Panagoulis was captured a few hours later in a nearby sea cave after his escape boat had not shown up.

The perpetrator was transported to the Greek Military Police (EAT-ESA) headquarters where he was questioned, beaten, and tortured. He was sentenced to death three months later but served for five years and was shown mercy because the junta fell before his execution.

The junta fades

When the junta finally succumbed to the anger of the repressed Greek people and the outcry from around the globe, they decided to call elections in 1973.

First, Colonel Papadopoulos appointed Spyridon Markezinis as Prime Minister of Greece and then appointed himself President of the Republic.

Various people hoped that these elections would be democratic unlike the rigged 1968 referendum which had taken place to change the Constitution. No one will ever know what could have happened if it hadn’t been for the Polytechnic uprising.

In November of 1973, a few hundred students and other Greek citizens, fed up with the repression of the regime, occupied the building of the National Technical University of Athens and called for the colonels to step down from power.

The events of November 17th, when the premises of the university were brutally cleared out by the military with the use of a tank, left several dead.

The turmoil provided an opportunity for hardliner Colonel Dimitrios Ioannidis to topple Papadopoulos on November 25th with yet another coup.

His ambitious plan to overthrow the President of Cyprus, Archbishop Makarios, so that Greece and Cyprus could unite, essentially made possible the Turkish invasion of the island on July 20, 1974.

Only three days later, Ioannidis resigned, finally opening the way for Constantine Karamanlis to return to Greece and establish a democratic government.

All Greek junta members were arrested and brought to trial; it was a mass trial. Papadopoulos, Pattakos, Makarezos, and Ioannidis were sentenced to death for high treason, but their sentences were later commuted to life imprisonment.

Mysteries About the Pyramids No Scientist Can Explain

Muystery of the Pyramids and the Sphinx
The construction of the Giza pyramids and the Sphinx will always remain a mystery. Credit: Ovedc Wikimedia Commons CC BY-SA 4.0

The construction of the Pyramids of Giza and the origin of the Sphinx in Egypt will forever remain mysteries as no scientist has ever produced convincing explanations of their making and the speed of completion.

The lack of solid answers to questions asked for centuries has led to countless theories about the origin of those amazing, massive structures their construction seems to defy logic and science, given the time they were built.

The theories range from alien constructors who landed on Earth and built the pyramids almost overnight to speculation that large groups of laborers worked for decades rolling, pulling, pushing, and lifting 2.3 million blocks of limestone and granite weighing  2.5-8 tons each, were paid decent wages, ate proper meals and slept in stone accommodations. And all that to build the Great Pyramid of Khufu alone, weighing a total of six million tons.

Yet, to explain the mystery of constructions of such magnitude built 4500 years ago in simplistic 21st century construction terms is as convincing as saying that one morning the Egyptians woke up and saw the three pyramids standing and the Sphinx smiling at them.

Theory of the Ancient Egyptian Concrete

Several different experts and scientists have argued about the mystery of the Pyramids and Sphinx’s construction. The focus has always been on how the massive blocks were lifted up and put in place at the pyramid’s higher levels.

A recent scientific explanation is based on the assertion that the base and lower blocks used to build the Great Pyramid were limestone and granite, but from a certain point up, the blocks were made of ancient Egyptian concrete. It was a theory by Professor Josef Davidovits that the material used was geopolymer concrete.

Specifically, the blocks were made from damp limestone from the south side of the Giza Plateau. The limestone was dissolved in pools of water from the Nile, soda, and gypsum,  creating a mixture with a very high pH, and bringing it down to normal levels using salt. The evaporation of water would leave a clay-like mud, which was carried to the construction site and packed into wooden casts that were much easier to carry and were left to set.

Professor of Engineering Michael Barsoum, used a scanning electron microscope (SEM) to study rock structures. The research group used X-rays, plasma torches, and electron microscopes to study the microstructures of pyramid stones compared to natural stone from the Toura and Maadi quarries.

The microscopic structures showed they are likely reconstituted limestone. The binder used for the limestone aggregate was either silicon dioxide or a calcium and magnesium-rich silicate mineral. Many of the blocks are stratified, with large fossil fragments concentrated at the bottom and lighter grains at the top, while regular limestone is made of alternating bands since it is sedimentary in nature.

Even though the Davidovits theory is scientifically plausible, it has opponents who dispute the scientific evidence. They argue that the pyramid blocks have diverse shapes and that shows that molds were not used. They also dispute that the ancient Egyptians had such advanced knowledge of chemistry to make the huge blocks out of lime. Also, they argue that huge amounts of limestone chalk and burnt wood would have been needed to make the concrete. In addition, they claim that the Egyptians had the manpower to hoist all the natural stone they wanted.

Difference Between “I Believe that…” and Scientific Proof

Mark Lehner, a famous Egyptologist and associate of Harvard’s Semitic Museum, has studied the pyramids and the Sphinx for decades and continues to study the Giza Plateau to this day. He has mapped the structure of the whole Sphinx construction stone to stone and claims it is all made of granite and lime blocks.

Lehner has done exemplary work on the “pyramid city”, the Giza pyramid builders’ administrative center including workshops, storage buildings, bakeries, and sleeping quarters, arguing that the laborers were not slaves but “bak”, an Egyptian word that means “owe to someone above me”. Everyone in Egypt owed bak, even high officials. The number of people working was estimated at about 20,000.

Yet, despite Lehner’s life work, there is no definitive answer as to how the pyramids were built.

The Sphinx Also Poses Questions

Also, there is no concrete answer on who built the Sphinx, what was the purpose of this gigantic stone creature and when was it built. Was it built by Khufu (Cheops) or his son and successor Khafre? Or did the former start work and the latter finish it? Or the Sphinx is much older, as some alternative Egyptologists argue? Lehner discards that theory and sticks to his own conclusions. However, he leaves room for doubt. In his own words, “As certain as we can be about such matters, Khafre created most of the Sphinx. However, Khufu might have started it.”

“As certain as we can be about such matters”: As long as this admission of doubt lingers over the construction methods, the purpose, the location choice, the exact time period, the pharaoh who gave the orders, the laborers, and all those factors, the mysteries that surround the pyramids will remain mysteries.

US House Passes $61 Billion Ukraine Aid Package

United States House of Representatives
The United States House of Representatives has approved a multi-billion dollar aid package for Ukraine. Credit: Joshua Sukoff / Upsplash

A $61 billion aid package for Ukraine was approved by the US House of Representatives on Saturday. Later that same day, the House also approved a $26.4 billion aid package for Israel.

The vote, which had been postponed by Republicans for several months, encountered objections from some members who opposed allocating funds abroad instead of directing resources towards the US-Mexico border.

The Senate is anticipated to pass the measure in the coming days, paving the way for President Joe Biden to sign it into law. According to officials speaking to US media, certain munitions could be delivered to Ukraine within a week of the measure’s enactment.

Ukraine Aid Package One Step Closer to Passing After US House Approves

Following significant delays, the Ukraine aid package passed the House of Representatives comfortably with a vote of 311 to 112.

However, these numbers mask deepening partisan divisions on the issue. Despite unanimous support from Democrats, with all 210 voting in favor of the $61 billion aid package, a larger number of Republicans opposed the legislation, with 112 voting against it compared to 101 in favor.

Republican Speaker of the House Mike Johnson collaborated with Democrats to overcome procedural obstacles and facilitate the vote on the aid package during this uncommon Saturday session.

Reactions

President Biden welcomed the House’s decision and thanked Mr Johnson for reaching across party lines to reach a decision.

“At this critical inflection point, they came together to answer history’s call, passing urgently-needed national security legislation that I have fought for months to secure,” Biden said.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky also welcomed the result, with a post on X stating: “I am grateful to the United States House of Representatives, both parties, and personally Speaker Mike Johnson for the decision that keeps history on the right track.

“Democracy and freedom will always have global significance and will never fail as long as America helps to protect it.

“The vital US aid bill passed today by the House will keep the war from expanding, save thousands and thousands of lives, and help both of our nations to become stronger.

“Just peace and security can only be attained through strength. We hope that bills will be supported in the Senate and sent to President Biden’s desk. Thank you, America!”

NATO Secretary Jens Stoltenberg likewise praised the House’s decision. “Ukraine is using the weapons provided by Nato allies to destroy Russian combat capabilities,” he said on X. “This makes us all safer, in Europe and North America.”

Why Greeks Smash Plates: The History Behind the Custom

smashing plates
Dancers smashing plates at Opa Hollywood, as per Greek tradition. Credit: Greek Reporter

The sound of a plate smashing, shattering loudly as it meets the floor, is distinctive and tends to turn heads in a restaurant. Most of us, startled, “think, Oh No!” an unfortunate accident has occurred.

But when plates shatter on the floor at a gathering of Greeks – whether it is at a taverna, a wedding, a baptism, or an intimate party, smashing those plates is no accident.

Breaking plates is done purposely, accompanied by music, in celebration, and you will often hear the word “Opa!” expressed with great joie de vivre when it happens.

The custom is less common than it once was at the height of its popularity in the 1960s and 1970s, and is somewhat of a cliche, perhaps reflecting a more touristic view of Greece. Nevertheless, it remains a fun and iconic part of Greek culture, even if most Greeks are now more likely to throw flowers than plates at a bustling taverna or lively concert.

Smashing Plates Has No Clear Starting Date in History

Smashing plates became well-known and normalized to people outside of Greece following the debut of the 1960 film “Never On Sunday.” There is a scene that shows the main characters in a raucous moment of really having a good time as glasses drop and smash on the floor during a dance.

It is uncertain when the custom of smashing plates began in Greece, itself. However, it is certainly a multipurpose ritual. Smashing plates has been used to signal the end and the beginning, to ward off evil spirits, and to express abundance.

In symbolic ritual, a plate is smashed at the graveside of the departed following a Greek Orthodox funeral. Life has ended on earth. The plate is smashed, signifying the end of life. Smashing the plate is also considered an act of mourning.

Smashing plates is done for joy as well as to mourn. It was once believed that a celebration could draw the attention of bad energy, or even worse, nasty spirits. To ward off evil spirits that might wreak havoc on a newly married couple smashing a few plates was considered to serve as camouflage. The violence of plate breaking fooled the spirits so they would not suspect a happy event was taking place at the gathering.

Breaking plates may also be related to the ancient practice of conspicuous consumption to display wealth. In the past plates or glasses were thrown into the hearth following a banquet instead of being washed and reused.

Eventually, plate smashing demonstrated a devil-may-care attitude because of abundance as well as a celebratory spirit. The individual was comfortable enough that plates could be broken because there was plenty. The dinnerware could be tossed and broken as it could be easily replaced. The action tells the world: We have so much to eat and so many dishes that we can toss away our resources.

Accompanied by the music for the dance as plates are smashed there is also a particular word associated with the action. The word “Opa” actually means something like “oops!” or “whoops!” or “Watch out!” In dedicated plate smashing sessions, it means “pay attention.” The word is so embedded in the ritual that when you hear the word “Opa!” you expect to hear a plate breaking. This practice, paired with dancing and live music, is symbolic of Greek celebrations.

The Decline in Popularity of Plate Smashing

By 1969 the military dictatorship of Georgios Papadopoulos, which had suspended democracy and ruled Greece autocratically from 1967 to 1973, banned plate smashing in nightclubs. Flying shards of pottery were dangerous, so plate smashing was outlawed in the taverns and nightclubs of Greece.

In the spirit of smashing plates, a variation on the custom was introduced using flowers. Diners at small Greek restaurants or tavernas were able to buy trays of flowers that they could throw at singers and each other in fun and celebration.

In the past decade, rather than pricey flowers or stacks of plates, often an exuberant client will grab a stack of paper napkins and dump them over the dancers’ heads as they perform.

Since 1974 specially-produced plaster plates have been used. There were 53 manufacturers of plaster plates in the northern city of Thessaloniki in those heady times.

In filming “Never On Sunday,” Jules Dassin needed to reshoot the plate-smashing scene several times. He used defective plates that were factory rejects. Following the film’s success, plate smashing became even more popular.

In the 60s up to 100,000 plates per month were smashed and more than fifty workshops were established employing around 1000 people to cover the needs of partygoers and their plate smashing. Eventually, they turned to plaster copies of plates, to prevent injury and reduce costs.

In 1994, with the passage of a law restricting the opening hours of nightclubs, enthusiasm for plate smashing ebbed, as it tended to be more fun to do it way after midnight. Greece also became even more European and younger generations started preferring more Western types of bars and nightclubs over the kitsch of the bouzoukia clubs. Plates were once again used strictly for eating.

All but one manufacturer of plaster plates in the north of Greece shut down for good. The only remaining workshop making plaster plates in Greece is Tsiroulis Brothers. The company is located in Evosmos, Thessaloniki, and was established in 1975.

However, with the arrival of the internet and the immense popularity of online shopping, it is now possible to purchase plates purpose-made for breaking online.

smashed plates and flowers at nightclubs
Smashing plates and throwing flowers are part of nightlife revelry in Greece. Credit: Facebook/Tsilipoulis Brothers

Plate smashing is now officially discouraged as most establishments prefer customers to throw flowers rather than items that can cause serious injury, especially after a few drinks and impaired aim. Greece actually requires a license for establishments that want to allow breaking plates.

If you’re offered plates to throw during dances or other performances, be aware that these plates are typically not free and they will be tallied up at the end of the evening, usually at least a euro or two each. Smashing plates can be an expensive form of noise making.

Those who practice plate smashing will do it in any combination of ways. They may take the plate and hurl it to the floor, they may take the plate and break it over their head or they may hold a stack of plates in one hand and in the other hand, a single plate used to hammer through and shatter the stack. Most often, however, as a favorite dancer performs, plates are smashed around their feet to honor their talent.

A Cherished Aspect of the Tourist Experience

Many tourists expect to witness plate smashing at a taverna during their vacations in Greece and it remains a staple part of the entertainment in some of Greece’s tourist hotspots.

Hippie Fish, a seaside restaurant in Mykonos, has a “Greek Night” every Sunday. Spartan warriors greet patrons upon entry to the establishment and decorate customers with an olive wreath. Following the meal, professional dancers perform traditional favorites like the hasapiko, also known as the syrtaki. When dancing was not allowed as part of the Covid-19 safety restrictions, patrons were handed ceramic plates to smash in designated boxes so they could be a part of the performance.

Noeme, a tourist in Greece who is from Brazil said, “It was kind of weird at first to start throwing the plates and breaking them. But once I got into it, I didn’t want to stop.  The music and our laughter around the table, got me excited and really put me in a mood to have fun.”

And that mood for fun is what is known as “kefi” in Greek. As the plates are smashed, you will shout Opa! and perhaps break out in a dance yourself.